When was the last time you saw gas below $ 3.00 per gallon, $ 4.00? Do you wonder like I do why on earth there is such a spike in gas prices? Now I know they are telling us that it is a supply and demand issue, but that only works if a bunch more people have started driving daily since the gas prices raise daily, no I think there is something much larger at play here and after doing a little careful reading I think I have stumbled upon the reason and you can call me Looney all you want but the facts are the facts and they cannot be disputed I really do not care how many economics professors say otherwise. You see in April 2007 Nancy Pelosi visited Syria, now keep in mind that also at this time we were having Al Gores Global warming crap shoved down our throats. Now at that time our gas prices were up slightly enough to make you sweat a little but not enough to make you cringe.

What assumptions do congressmen make about the American people? Do they assume that we’re dumb or ill-informed about the energy problems we are experiencing? Every time there has been a huge spike in gasoline prices, Congress hauls oil company executives before their committees to accuse them of greed, obscene profits and price-fixing. One federal investigation after another of supposed oil company misconduct turns up nothing to substantiate congressional allegations. Unfortunately, the congressional hearings make front-page news and lead the evening television news, but the results of federal investigations that follow are only casually mentioned deep in the body of newspapers and get little or no time on the evening television news. If news media people had an ounce of integrity, they would highlight the federal investigation findings that undermine congressional charges of oil company misconduct, and they would question the members of Congress who made those charges.

The dirty secret of the environmental movement is how indifferent it can be to the poor.

Being attacked by Greenpeace should be considered a badge of honor. In May, the Heartland Institute was the subject of a Greenpeace news release that described the Chicago-based think tank as “a free-market, anti-regulation right wing think tank” funded by leading American corporations and reputable foundations.

New evidence supports premise that Earth produces endless supply - A study published in Science Magazine today [Feb. 1, 2008] presents new evidence supporting the abiotic theory for the origin of oil, which asserts oil is a natural product the Earth generates constantly rather than a “fossil fuel” derived from decaying ancient forests and dead dinosaurs.

Conventional wisdom/theory holds that oil is a fossil fuel. A fossil fuel is one developed in the earth’s crust over millions of years from decaying plants and animals. Therefore, fossil fuels are a non-renewable resource because they take millions of years to form and reserves are being depleted much faster than new ones can be created.

This article expands and updates my previous articles and should be read with them.  Failure of IPCC to properly consider Solar Influence(1) which is about the failure of the IPCC to properly consider solar influences and The link between solar cycle length and decadal global temperature(2) which explains that according to real world observations the matter of solar cycle length is very significant.

The Norwegian government is building its high-tech new Global Seed Vault on the Arctic island of Svalbard to protect the world’s plant varieties in case of global climate change. Meanwhile, outside the Svalbard vault, the island’s own hardy Arctic plants are demonstrating that Mother Nature knows how to keep her species alive through natural adaptation to the earth’s naturally radical climate cycling.

New evidence supports premise that Earth produces endless supply - A study published in Science Magazine today [Feb. 1, 2008] presents new evidence supporting the abiotic theory for the origin of oil, which asserts oil is a natural product the Earth generates constantly rather than a “fossil fuel” derived from decaying ancient forests and dead dinosaurs.

Think energy is expensive now? Wait until Congress plugs in the “Climate Security Act of 2007.”

...At the first Earth Day celebration, in 1969, environmentalist Nigel Calder warned, “The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind.” C.C. Wallen of the World Meteorological Organization said, “The cooling since 1940 has been large enough and consistent enough that it will not soon be reversed.”

...Speaking last weekend at a high-tech firm near St. Louis, Missouri, the President attempted to defend himself against the charge that his policies were responsible for rising food prices.

Add the word “sustainable” to almost any project, and immediately, the project becomes politically correct and therefore, acceptable.  The surge of “sustainability” or “sustainable development” in recent years is phenomenal.  Americans have been awed by the sales pitch and have bought into the idea of “sustainable development” - without looking under the hood to examine the engine.  Nor have Americans realized that “sustainable development” is a self-directing vehicle that is transforming a once-free society into sustainable communities where nearly every human activity requires the permission of government.

Global warming alarmists, news media portray arctic beasts as victims and spokesbears, but protecting their thriving population means greatly increased federal power to control our lives.

Now that another Earth Day has come and gone, let’s look at some environmentalist predictions that they would prefer we forget.